Lack of Evidence for Usual Medical Care and Physiotherapy and Evidence of Obvious Bias Against Chiropractic

BEST DOCTORS – BEST CARE – BEST OUTCOMES – BEST PRACTICES

Build your knowledge, your confidence, your certainty, your patient outcomes, and your practice!

This bundle contains 14 issues - valued at $140 (@$10 per review)!

• Study Shows No Clinically Meaningful Benefit from McGill Exercises – Ghorbanpour
• A.R.T. Evidence-Based or Experimental – Kim
• Back Surgery A Review of the Evidence – Chestnut
• NSAIDs for Acute and Chronic Back Pain No Benefit - Van der Gaag and Enthoven
• Passive Physiotherapy Modalities are NOT Evidence-Based or Effective – Chestnut
• Opioids Pandemic of Addiction, Fraud, and Corruption – Chestnut
• Usual Medical and Physical Therapy Care Increase Risk of Back Pain - Stevans
• Latest Systematic Review of SMT - How to Critique the Critique – Paige
• Study Uses Mobilizations as SMT and then Concludes SMT no good – Hancock
• Evidence of Bias Against Chiropractic and SMT in Peer Review Literature – Chestnut
• Evidence of Bias in Systematic Reviews of SMT – Chestnut
• Another Review of a Systematic Review – Hidalgo
• Summary of Evidence of Bias Against SMT in Systematic Reviews – Chestnut
• Evidence of Bias in Systematic Reviews of SMT - Foster

Evidence Builds Certainty and Evidence-Based Certainty Builds Successful Practices – For Patients, Staff, and Doctors!

Build Knowledge – Build Certainty – Build Success